https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/things-could-be-better thumbs its nose at the academic #IMRAD paper, reporting a finding, robust over issues, populations and questioning procedures, that people when asked how something could be different always say how it could be better.
What would have happened if people were asked how a narrow escape from a bad situation, like #Jan6, could have turned out differently?
People might say, Trump could have served an extra term.
Which would be bad (or good), depending on your point of view.
Humor and #iconoclasum are great but invested in helping #non-native-speaking researchers get their work published, I’m supporting IMRAD.
It tells a story too, if an over-formalized and not-exactly-true one.
Back to ActionResearch